Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
@CameToPlay - wasn't at Dicks, but upon closely listening to all 3 shows, I thought 8.31 was by far the fullest and most complete. Some people will rate a show with one or 2 huge jams higher, others might weigh in a slightly better first set. Definitely as much art as science. No list of standard criteria, other than "how good did you think it was."
@n00b100 - imo, 10.28 was one of the better first sets of the year. Energy was bonkers. But the second set, despite having a couple great components (including of course that monster Hood) didn't really come together for me. I'd have a hard time calling that one a top x 2nd set of the year. Pretty sure I had that show ranked somewhere 10 - 12.
@phunkytittymusic - well played!